After every discourse with anyone –intellectual or otherwise – I invariably tend to have a rethink about my position because I tend to argue ferociously and my views come across as too strong which does not augur well for any discourse but I do listen contrary to what some over the years have thought.
Yesterday was a good day for such reflections – I spent over 5 hours with some drink buddies and we debated issues that centred on Fashola and his policies. Anyone who read one of my earlier blogs -
FASHOLA AS AN ELITIST GOVERNOR: THE TEJUOSHO MARKET EXAMPLE
(THE CONSPIRACY AGAINST THE POOR)
would guess that I think BRF is an elitist. His actions since then have not done anything to allay those suspicions but rather to bolster them.
The thing about our people is that we tend so soon to forget that the things that happened in the past may yet happen if we do not put in place some basic structures from the very beginning of our democracy and I will get to this after I state briefly some things that BRF has done to further indicate his elitist thinking.
The ban on okada riders from some places may look right to some people but I am old enough to know that nobody passed a decree for okada to be the mode of transportation in Lagos before it came about. Terminating the effect without treating the cause is as futile as applying tissue paper on a haemorrhaging wound. There are over 2 million part time and full time okada riders in Lagos the majority of who pay tax and daily levy of N200 to the state purse in their parks. The thirteen-sectioned restrictive ban law that BRF’s Gov't passed will not help in alleviating the economic conditions of these people as well as the various people who depend on this means of transportation to commute daily. The bad roads, bad vehicles, inadequate (and exorbitant) public transport vehicles etc are all directly responsible for bad traffic and not motorcyclists alone. Yes, we motorists love to hate them but for crying out loud they also have a right to be here because even the Road Safety Code accepts the rights of motorcyclists in telling motorists to be considerate of other road users. Because someone drives a lesser vehicle (okada) does not mean that I have more right of way than he.
Forcing okada riders away from most urban areas and highways is an invitation to chaos since no one at the RoundHouse foresaw that it just may have been better to provide other alternatives – like better roads, more BRT buses and so on before gradually allowing the natural forces of economy to push them away. How did Marwa ensure the popularity of Keke Marwa? Was it by official decree even though he had the military might and legitimacy of power? Did he suppress other means of transportation to promote what he felt was the best? The answer is obvious and the result to is there for the world to judge. If Marwa had dared that, some of us would have stoutly resisted but under BRF, we have been seduced into thinking that whatever he does must be the best way to do it and that is the start of dictatorship. In any case, do okada ply the Lagos-Ibadan expressway and is there no hold up along that road? Can we say with confidence that the okada restrictive ban has eased traffic anywhere in Lagos state? BRF has become a dictator and the concepts of democracy is lost in Lagos state.
Democracy all over the world is built on several principles but the most important concept is the people. When democracy stops been about the people, what you have in place is either a monarchy (rule by divine right) or an aristocracy (rule by select few). If our democracy is built on the American ideal then it is important for us to refer to that nation to get a good idea of what we should be guided by. Some smart ones say that America has had more years of practice than we have and to such I say we should not therefore carry out reforms to become in one day a megacity like America without taking time to think about the effect on the downtrodden like America did well before its 50th independence anniversary.
The argument of course is watery: America put some things in place from the very start and at the stage where we are in their political development, the issues that were raised are the same ones that we are raising now and some choose to only see the political side of it. Is there even anything wrong with that? No matter how good a proposal by the Democrats in US might be, it is the duty of the Republicans to subject it to vigorous debate for whatsoever reason. In Nigeria though, the brand of bias is avoided like a stigma and even opposition political parties shirk from this duty to the people so, someone has to do it. Following are the basic ideals on which democracy is founded as subscribed to by the founding fathers of modern democracy:
People must accept the principle of majority rule;
The political rights of minorities must be protected;
Citizens must agree to a system of rule by law;
The free exchange of opinions and ideas must not be restricted;
All citizens must be equal before the law and,
Government exists to serve the people, because it derives its power from the people.
In order to achieve these ideals, the US put in place four structures from the very early days of their democracy:
popular sovereignty: meaning that the people are the ultimate source of the government’s authority;
representative government;
checks and balances; and
federalism, an arrangement where powers are shared by different levels of government.
Popular sovereignty is present in Lagos state. The Gov’t of the day is perceived to have ridden to power on the basis of winning popular election. Indeed, BRF came to power with 828,424 votes to emerge as the most voted for candidate. This figure though, represents a very small minority of the over 17.5 million which the state claims as its population. If we are to go by the principle of representative Gov’t though, the number represents the majority of those who are resident in the state. Who are the majority? Is it the millions of poor and middle class folks or those elite who are less than one million? The answer as obvious as it is eludes the Gov’t of Fashola that has its eyes fixed on transforming Lagos to a New York or Dubai at all costs. If we are in a monarchy, it is alright but under a democracy, consultations and consensus are two of the most salient aspect. You just have to carry people along. We told OBJ that he did not own sovereignty but that it was given to him to hold in trust and to be withdrawn whenever we deemed it necessary.
Am I therefore saying that the Gov’t should only do what its citizens perceive to be right? Under a democracy, YES! If we were in a monarchy, or aristocracy or even a theocracy, the head decides because like Louis XIV – the sun king said, ‘the head of state is the state’. In a democracy though, the head cannot just take decisions no matter how right he feels they are if the majority are not in support. Case in point: the Iraqi war was a misadventure for the U.S. but because George W. Bush had the support of the American and Iraqi people to overthrow the Gov’t of Saddam Hussein, he was able to carry on. When it came out though that he had manipulated the thinking of the people by claiming that Iraq had Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD), he and his party lost favour very quickly because the American people realised they had been deceived.
BRF’s Gov’t doesn’t even bother to try to convince us before it carries out its plans. It simply arranges for the LSHA to rubber stamp its decision. Our honourables though, are now kicking against the arrangement. This brings us to the issue of checks and balances.
When we elected BRF, we also elected a house of assembly to carry out oversight functions of the executive arm (which BRF heads) while providing a platform for citizens to make their voices heard via subjecting Gov’t decisions to public debate. The blame for the lack of vigorous debates in the public square rests a little with the masses themselves. How many of us have ever gone to Alausa to watch the proceedings of the lawmakers? Nevertheless, Gov’t can sensitise and mobilise the masses the same way they are mobilised when it’s time for political rallies. If BRF had consulted very well on the okada issue, he would not fall into the dilemma that is sure to come within six months. The LSHA merely rubber stamped this particular decision and several others before it.
This piece therefore is simply about the emerging dictatorship of BRF. The only thing necessary for evil to thrive is for a few good men to keep silent. Part 2 of this piece will prove this assertion further.